Citatio: D. Groddek, hethiter.net/: grodlist s.v. KUB 16.51 (v. 0.7)
Literatur zu KUB 16.51:
(+) Y. Sakuma, Diss. Bd. II, 84f., 733
M. Schuol, AoF 21 (1994), 101
Vs. 1 J. Puhvel, HED V, 72
Vs. 4 HW2 I, 75a
Vs. 4 Th.P.J. van den Hout, GS Klíma, 114 A. 14
Vs. 7-11.27-28 HW2 I, 93a
Vs. 8 B.H.L. van Gessel, OHP, II, 767
Vs. 8 HW2 I, 521a
Vs. 9 HW2 I, 519a
I 10 J. Friedrich, ZA 39 (1929), 35 A. 1
Vs. 10 J. Puhvel, HED IV, 99
Vs. 10 A. Hagenbuchner-Dresel, FS Tischler, 105 A. 40
Vs. 12f. HW2 I, 176b
Vs. 12ff. HW2 I, 190b
Vs. 13 St. de Martino, ChS I/7, 147
13 M. Schuol, AoF 21 (1994), 288 A. 510
Vs. 13 R.H. Beal, Magic, 60 A. 29
Vs. 13 E. Laroche, RHA 12, Fasz. 54 (1952), 46 A. 112
Vs. 15ff. A. Ünal, RHA 31 (1973), 27 A. 1, 29
(+) Vs. 15 H. Marquardt, DBH 34, 84
Vs. 15 HW2 I, 175b
Vs. 15 J. Puhvel, HED III, 101
Vs. 15 P. Cotticelli, Mat.heth.Thes. 11 (Nr. 8), 30
Vs. 16f. HW2 I, 264b
Vs. 18 HW2 I, 157b
Vs. 18f. HW2 I, 158a
Vs. 18 E. Laroche, RHA 10, Fasz. 51 (1948-1949), 25
Vs. 19 L. Zuntz, Diss., 53
Vs. 19 A. Ünal, RHA 31 (1973), 37
Vs. 20 B.H.L. van Gessel, OHP II, 857
Vs. 21 H. Otten, RHA 18 (1960), 125
Vs. 21 J. Hazenbos, Orakelfrage, 97
Vs. 21 A. Archi, SMEA 16 (1975), 132
Vs. 21 E. Laroche, Rec., 18
Vs. 21 E. Laroche, NH, 44
Vs. 22 J. Puhvel, HED V, 71
Rs. A. Ünal, BiOr 44 (1987), 475
Rs. 3 B.H.L. van Gessel, OHP, II, 720
Rs. 6 HW2 I, 176b
Gerfrid G.W. Müller -- 2008- 2024